Efficiency Concerns: False Bottom

In the most recent batch, I achieved a much lower extract efficiency than I was expecting, and measurement of the first runnings gravity indicates that the vast majority of the loss can be attributed to the sparging process. I have a suspicion that the problem is in part due to sparge water channeling around the outside of my vegetable steamer false bottom. The ‘petals’ don’t have enough weight to stay tight against the outside of the lauter tun, and some tend to spring back a few millimeters. The weight of the grain bed ought to hold them tight against the sides, but even then there are decent sized gaps.

IMG_5161

To remedy this, I had an idea: why not cut some plastic tubing lengthwise, so that it has a ‘c’ shaped cross-section, and wrap it around the outside to form a seal with the sides of the lauter tun. We’ll see if lauter efficiency is any better in batch number three.

IMG_5174

IMG_5172

IMG_5167

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Efficiency Concerns: False Bottom

    1. I don’t have that problem since I use the cooler only as a lauter tun. The mash rests in the kettle, which I put in the oven set to 70C after dough in, so I experience no temperature loss of the course of the sacc rest. It’s only after mashing that I transfer the mash to the cooler and begin lautering.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s